雅思寫作范文：8分范文鑒賞

　　眾所周知，雅思寫作范文是烤鴨們進(jìn)行雅思備考必備的雅思材料，但真正通過雅思寫作范文模板來提高的烤鴨卻是少之又少，究其根本就是大家沒有對如何應(yīng)用雅思寫作范文掌握相應(yīng)的備考使用方法，下面小編就為大家?guī)硪黄潘紝懽?分范文鑒賞：

　　范文一

　　雅思寫作題目：

　　Some people believe that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Others believe there are other factors. Discuss the two sides and give your opinion.

　　雅思寫作范文：

　　對幸福的追求一直都是人類世世代代的夢想，盡管人類一直困惑于幸福的真諦。幸福是什么?幸福和經(jīng)濟(jì)的成功有密切聯(lián)系嗎?個(gè)人經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功能夠直接帶來幸福嗎?就個(gè)人而言，我不認(rèn)為經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功是人類幸福的唯一前提。

　　The pursuit of happiness has long been the dream of generations of human beings. They have always been puzzled Get Word ("puzzled"); by the essence of happiness. What is happiness? Is it closely related to one’s economic success? Will one’s financial success lead to happiness directly? Personally Get Word ("Personally"), I don’t agree that one’s economic success is the only prerequisite of one’s happiness in life.

　　幸福有很多種。俗話說得好，“一個(gè)人的美食可能是另一個(gè)人的毒藥”。幸福可能意味著成為一個(gè)成功的受人尊敬的領(lǐng)袖，或是一份穩(wěn)定舒適的大型跨國公司的工作，又或是市區(qū)的大房子、一套漂亮的家具等等。然而，幸福也可以是一個(gè)和諧平靜的家庭，或是一個(gè)體貼熱情的朋友，或者只是一個(gè)微笑、一個(gè)手勢、一個(gè)暗示。事實(shí)上，幸?？梢允悄隳軌蛳氲降娜魏问虑?。至少，我們可以有兩種幸福：精神幸福和物質(zhì)幸福。

　　Happiness may fall into different categories Get Word ("categories");. An old saying goes like this: “One man’s meat is another man’s poison”. Happiness may mean being a successful and respected leader of a company, or a stable and comfortable job in a large international company, or a big flat downtown, a fantastic set of furniture, etc. However, happiness can also be a harmonious and peaceful family, or a hospitable and considerate friend, or just a smile, a gesture, a hint. In fact, happiness may be composed of anything you could ever think of. At least, we may have two types of happiness:spiritualGetWord("hospitable and considerate friend, or just a smile, a gesture, a hint. In fact, happiness may be composed of anything you could ever think of. At least, we may have two types of happiness: [wv]spiritual"); happiness and materialistic happiness.

　　一方面，一個(gè)人的物質(zhì)幸福依賴于經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功，盡管不是完全依賴。沒有穩(wěn)定的經(jīng)濟(jì)后盾，很難想象如何過上輕松簡單的生活，更不用說富庶奢侈的生活了。如果買不起房子、車，甚至是一本書，任何人提到這種生活都會害怕。當(dāng)然，有一些人只要基本的生活需求得到滿足就可以立刻感到很幸福。但是我們?nèi)匀槐仨毘姓J(rèn)，這些人也需要某種意義上的經(jīng)濟(jì)成功。

　　One’s materialistic happiness is dependant on one’s economic success, though not completely. Without a strong and steady economic background, one could never imagine an easy and simple life, let alone an affluent and luxurious one. If you aren’t able to afford a house, a car, or even a book, anybody would be horrified at the mere mention of this kind of life. Definitely, some people will feel happy right away if their basic demands for life are satisfied. However, we have to admit that these people still need to be successful materialisticallyGetWord("materialistically"); to some degree.

　　另一方面，個(gè)人經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功不見得能帶來精神層面的幸福。眾所周知，金錢不能帶來一切，甚至有人說金錢是萬惡之源。經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功可能就是建立在犧牲時(shí)間、健康和愛情的基礎(chǔ)之上，而這三件事情是個(gè)人精神層面幸福的基本要素。我們對于這個(gè)畫面并不陌生：一位職場成功的男士帶著一顆破碎的心獨(dú)自品味孤獨(dú)。

　　On the other hand, one’s success in economy may not necessarily lead to one’s spiritual happiness. As we all know, money doesn’t get you everything and some even say that money is the root of all evilsGetWord("evils");. One’s financial success may be built on the sacrifice of time, health and love, which are the three most essential elements of spiritual happiness. All of us are not new to this picture: a successful business man tasting loneliness alone with a broken heart.

　　以我的觀點(diǎn)，經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功只是幸福的一個(gè)重要因素，但絕對不是唯一因素。盡管我們每一個(gè)人對于幸福有完全不同的理解，要幸福就要精神上和物質(zhì)上都能得到滿足。

　　In my point of view, one’s economic success is only one of the key factors of happiness, but never the only one. To be happy, one needs to be both spiritually and materially satisfied Get Word ("satisfied"); though each of us may have a totally different picture of happiness.

　　上面就是通過雅思8分范文為大家解析的如何更好的應(yīng)用雅思寫作模板，希望烤鴨們能從上面的閱讀中，好好的模仿學(xué)習(xí)，在練習(xí)中進(jìn)行相關(guān)的超越，找出適合自己的學(xué)習(xí)方法，謹(jǐn)記，他山之石可以攻玉，雅思寫作的備考更是如此。

　　范文二

　　雅思寫作題目：

　　The subjects and lesson contents are decided by the authorities such as the government. Some people argue that teachers should make the choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　雅思寫作范文：

　　It has long been argued amid the community: Which one counts more, authority or academy? Notwithstanding the fact that our current pedagogy is so much clinging to the central committee, the educational system is in a blockbuster amount of outcry for reform. Does the temporary system still embrace rationality? Or is it the ripe juncture to refurnish it out and out? I personally took a deep look in it.

　　In the showdown between authority and academy, the former arguably outweighs the latter. Politics is a compulsory course in all kinds of enrollment examinations as well as all levels of educational institutions. The government, or a commander-in-chief to be vivid, needs to be held accountable for the stability of society. Education is by all means an almighty tool to incubate a behaving generation. With social development gaining momentum, a farsighted power base generally with a broader scope than the individuals, needs to build up particular majors specializing in fledgling domains involving cleaning energy, high-tech innovation, interpretation, to name but a few. Trained personnel in such fields are usually more fit into the society.

　　Arguments being articulated above though, academy-oriented teaching methodology is so far still reputed for its own merits. With teachers gaining more says in selecting knowledge, the students will presumably be inculcated with a more objective perception of the curriculum. Without authority barging in, the possibility of the impartiality being jeopardized is excluded for the mission of serving the regime is no longer valid. Only under such circumstance can the intrinsic value of the subject be authentically and manifested to the thirsty learners in an untangled manner. An untarnished and pristine academic ambience is colossally demanding by numerous pundits for the sake of equity and truth.

　　To sum up, there's no such inception that is appropriate to be dubbed "sheerly right" or "starkly wrong" . The righteous one solely lies in the rationality of adapting it. Authority, in China's case, can never be an outlier standing by the side of academic circle owing to its unique national condition.