GRE寫作出分之后，同學(xué)如果覺(jué)得成績(jī)不滿意，可以申請(qǐng)復(fù)議。那么具體的復(fù)議流程是怎樣的呢?小編為大家整理詳細(xì)的內(nèi)容，供大家參考，希望對(duì)大家的GRE寫作復(fù)議有一定的幫助!

新GRE作文復(fù)議流程

準(zhǔn)備復(fù)議材料 (證明材料，身份證及復(fù)印件)——支付復(fù)議費(fèi)(到銀行填寫匯票單)——填寫必備信息(查看) —— 將申請(qǐng)材料、銀行出據(jù)的匯票一起寄給ETS(收款人姓名：GRE-ETS、收款人地址：P.O. BOX 6000, Princeton, NJ08541-6000, USA)。

gre考試成績(jī)復(fù)議申請(qǐng)時(shí)間及范圍：

復(fù)議重判的6個(gè)月期限是從筆考開始算起的，從申請(qǐng)rescore開始的那天,就要抓緊跟ETS聯(lián)系，通過(guò)E-mail.GRE復(fù)議范圍有兩種：1、作文復(fù)議 2、語(yǔ)文數(shù)學(xué)復(fù)議。注意不要重發(fā)，否則有可能收雙倍的費(fèi)用.期間,要時(shí)刻追問(wèn)rescore的進(jìn)展。

注：一般考生都申請(qǐng)作文部分復(fù)議。因?yàn)檎Z(yǔ)文和數(shù)學(xué)部分為客觀題，判錯(cuò)的可能性很小。

gre考試成績(jī)復(fù)議費(fèi)用：

申請(qǐng)成績(jī)復(fù)議前，請(qǐng)確認(rèn)您已經(jīng)成功支付費(fèi)用。1.作文復(fù)議需要，2.語(yǔ)文數(shù)學(xué)部分復(fù)議。ETS接受的支付方式有很多，有信用卡、支票匯票等。

gre考試成績(jī)復(fù)議費(fèi)返還：

如果復(fù)議后，成績(jī)確實(shí)存在誤差，該費(fèi)用將退還考生，否則將被視為復(fù)議費(fèi)用，不再退還。

GRE寫作滿分范文1

Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.??

The?arguement?is?well?presented?and?supported,?but?not?completely?well?reasoned.??It?is?clear?and?concisely?written.??The?content?is?logically?and?smoothly?presented.??Statistics?cited?are?used?to?develop?support?for?the?recommendation,?that?roller?skaters?who?invest?in?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment?can?reduce?their?risk?of?severe,?accidental?injuries.??Examples?of?the?types?of?protective?equipment?are?described?for?the?reader.??Unfortunately,?the?author?of?the?argement?fails?to?note?that?merely?by?purchasing?gear?and?reflective?equipment?that?the?skater?will?be?protected.??This?is,?of?course,?falacious?if?the?skater?fails?to?use?the?equipment,?or?uses?it?incorrectly?or?inappropriately.??It?is?also?an?unnecessary?assumption?that?a?skater?need?purchase?high-quality?gear?for?the?same?degree?of? effectiveness?to?be?achieved.??The?argument?could?be?improved?by?taking?these?issues?into?consideration,?and?making?recommendations?for?education?and?safety?awareness?to?skaters.??

Commentary??

The?first?half?of?this?generally?well-written?but?limited?response?merely?describes?the?argument.??The?second?half?of?the?paper?identifies?two?assumptions?of?the?argument:??

--?that?people?who?purchase?protective?gear?will?use?the?gear?--?that?high-quality?gear?is?more?effective?than?other?gear??

These?points?are?sufficient?to?constitute?some?analysis?and?thus?warrant?a?score?of?3.??However,?neither?of?these?analytic?points?is?developed?sufficiently?to?merit?a?score?of?4.?

GRE寫作滿分范文2

Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.??

To?reduce?the?accidents?from?roller?skating?we?should?consider?about?it?causes?and?effects?concurrently?to?find?the?best?solution.??Basically?the?roller-skating?players?are?children,?they?had?less?experiences?to?protect?themselves?from?any?kind?of?dangerous.??Therefore,?it?should?be?a?responsible?of?adult?to?take?care?them.??Adult?should?recommend?their?child?to?wear?any?protective?clothing,?set?the?rules?and?look?after?them?while?they?are?playing.??

In?the?past?roller-skating?is?limited?in?the?skate?yard?but?when?it?became?popular?people?normally?play?it?on?the?street?way)?Therefore?the?number?of?accidents?from?roller-skating?is?increased.??The?skate?manufacturer?should?have?a?responsibility?in?producing?a?protective?clothing.??They?should?promote?and?sell?them?together?with?skates.??The?government?or?state?should?set?the?regulation?of?playing?skate?on?the?street?way?like?they?did?with?the?bicycle.??

To?prevent?this?kind?of?accident?is?the?best?solution?but?it?needs?a?coorperation?among?us?to?have?a?concious?mind?to?beware?and?realize?its?dangerous.??

Commentary??

This?seriously?flawed?response,?rather?than?critiquing?the?argument,?suggests?ways?for?adults?and?skate?manufacturers?to?ensure?that?children?wear?protective?clothing.??In?essence,?the?writer?is?uncritically?accepting?the?argument.??

The?response?exhibits?serious?and?frequent?problems?in?sentence?structure?and?language?use.??Errors?--?word?choice,?verb?tenses,?subject-verb?agreement,?punctuation?--?are?numerous?and?sometimes?interfere?with?meaning,?e.g.,?"?needs?a?cooperation?among?us?to?have?a?concious?mind?to?beware?and?realize its?dangerous."??

This?essay?earns?a?2?because?it?demonstrates?both?serious?linguistic?weaknesses?and?failure?to?construct?a?critique?based?on?logical?analysis.

GRE寫作滿分范文3

Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.??

the?protective?equipment?do?help?to?reduce?the?risk?of?being?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident?since?there?are?75%?Of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protectivel?clothing.?such?as?hemlets,?kenn?pads,?etc.?or?any?light-reflecting?materials?such?as?clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads?ets.?if?they?do?have?protective?eqipment?that?only?a?quarter?accident?may?happen,?also?that?can?greatly?reduce?their?risk?ofbeing?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident,?that?can?save?some?lives?and?a?lot?of?energy?and?money?for?the?treatment.??the?protective?equipment?do?help?to?reduce?the?risk?of?being?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident?since?there?are?75%?Of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protectivel?clothing.?such?as?hemlets,?kenn?pads,?etc.?or?any?light-reflecting?materials?such?as?clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads?ets.?if?they?do?have?protective?eqipment?that?only?a?quarter?accident?may?happen,?also?that?can?greatly?reduce?their?risk?ofbeing?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident,?that?can?save?some?lives?and?a?lot?of?energy?and?money?for?the?treatment.??the?protective?equipment?do?help?to?reduce?the?risk?of?being?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident?since?there?are?75%?Of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protectivel?clothing.?such?as?hemlets,?kenn?pads,?etc.?or?any?light-reflecting?materials?such?as?clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads?ets.?if?they?do?have?protective?eqipment?that?only?a?quarter?accident?may?happen,?also?that?can?greatly?reduce?their?risk?ofbeing?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident,?that?can?save?some?lives?and?a?lot?of?energy?and?money?for?the?treatment.??

Commentary??

This?fundamentally?deficient?response?uncritically?accepts?the?reasoning?of?the?topic:?"the?protective?equipment?do?help?to?reduce?the?risk?of?being?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident."??There?is?no?evidence,?though,?that?the?writer?is?able?to?understand?or?analyze?the?argument;?what?follows,?except?for?a?few?additional?words,?merely?copies?the?topic.??This?two-sentence?response?is?repeated?--?verbatim?--?two?more?times.??

Language?and?usage?are?equally?problematic.??The?few?words?that?have?been?added,?in?combination?with?the?words?of?the?topic,?results?in?incoherence.??In?sum,?this?essay?fits?all?of?the?scoring?guide?descriptors?for?a?1.?

新GRE作文復(fù)議流程相關(guān)文章：