經(jīng)典演講稿開場(chǎng)白
經(jīng)典演講稿開場(chǎng)白
經(jīng)典演講稿會(huì)吸引很多人的關(guān)注。下面就是學(xué)習(xí)啦小編給大家整理的經(jīng)典演講稿開場(chǎng)白，希望對(duì)你有用!
經(jīng)典演講稿開場(chǎng)白篇1
1 師德演講稿--愛與責(zé)任
世上有很多東西，給予他人的同時(shí)，自己往往是越來(lái)越少，而唯有一樣?xùn)|西卻是越給越多。您也許會(huì)驚奇地問(wèn)我：“那是什么呢?”我將毫不遲疑的回答您：“那就是愛!”愛，不是索取，不是等價(jià)交換，愛是付出，是自我犧牲。只有在愛的基礎(chǔ)上，教師才會(huì)投入他的全部力量，才會(huì)把他的青春、智慧無(wú)怨無(wú)悔地獻(xiàn)給學(xué)生，獻(xiàn)給教育事業(yè).
師愛，是教育力量的源泉，是教育成功的基礎(chǔ)，是教師的天職與責(zé)任。今年4月，我有幸在人民大會(huì)堂聆聽了方永剛先進(jìn)事跡報(bào)告會(huì)，感受到了這位“平民理論家”對(duì)學(xué)生的愛，對(duì)事業(yè)的愛。
2006年11月17日，結(jié)腸癌手術(shù)6小時(shí)后，方永剛從麻醉中醒來(lái)，第一句話問(wèn)的是他的研究生：你的畢業(yè)論文準(zhǔn)備得怎么樣了?
隨后幾天，方永剛又讓妻子把自己的3個(gè)研究生叫到病房。沒有講臺(tái)、沒有黑板、沒有課桌，方永剛坐在病床上給學(xué)生們上課。即使不一會(huì)兒就臉色發(fā)白，汗珠成串往下掉，他也不肯停下來(lái)。
做完第二次化療，方永剛惦記著自己還有幾次課沒上完，要回去上課。系領(lǐng)導(dǎo)不同意，方永剛急了：“我肚子有問(wèn)題，但腦子沒問(wèn)題，嘴沒問(wèn)題!如果離開了講臺(tái)，我可能真的會(huì)倒下。”說(shuō)著說(shuō)著他竟然哭了。在人生磨難面前，他沒有掉淚;在傷病痛苦面前，他沒有掉淚;在死神威脅面前，他也沒有掉淚;但因?yàn)樯喜涣诵膼鄣闹v臺(tái)，這個(gè)頂天立地的男子漢卻留下了兩行熱淚。他的淚水讓我們真正明白了什么是教師的品德。
終于，經(jīng)過(guò)再一、再二、再三的請(qǐng)求，2007年1月15日，在第二次和第三次化療的間隙，方永剛回到離開了兩個(gè)多月的教室。看到學(xué)生們，方永剛眼里閃爍出欣慰和滿足，那眼神似乎是說(shuō)：同學(xué)們，我終于又見到你們了!
這堂課，方永剛講的是《新世紀(jì)新階段我軍歷史使命》。
整整軍裝，開場(chǎng)白只有一句話：只要我還能站著，就要為大家講課，這是我的使命。
同學(xué)們強(qiáng)忍淚水，他們知道，此時(shí)此刻，他們的老師恐怕連站著都是一種抗?fàn)帲环N與生命的抗?fàn)帯?/p>
好像這只是一堂普通的政治課，是方永剛無(wú)數(shù)次授課中最普通的一堂課，依舊是鏗鏘有力的聲音，依舊是幽默風(fēng)趣的語(yǔ)言，依舊是充滿理性的思辯，依舊是入情入理的分析，只是一條白毛巾被他頻繁地拿起又放下，手術(shù)后的引流管被他掖在了軍裝里面……
學(xué)生們震驚了，這是一個(gè)癌癥晚期的患者嗎?這是一個(gè)即將接受第三次化療的病人嗎?
兩個(gè)小時(shí)的大課結(jié)束了。任何華麗的樂章也比不過(guò)這樣一堂課更能觸動(dòng)心靈，任何精彩的語(yǔ)言也會(huì)顯得蒼白無(wú)力，同學(xué)們用雷鳴般的掌聲和充滿敬意的目光向方老師敬禮!
什么是使命?共產(chǎn)黨員的使命是崇高的，軍人的使命是偉大的，教師的使命是神圣的，不用多說(shuō)什么，不用多做什么，方永剛，一名共產(chǎn)黨員、軍人、教師，在癌癥晚期的時(shí)候往講臺(tái)上一站，就是對(duì)使命的最好詮釋。
勤勤懇懇、默默無(wú)聞”這是老黃牛的精神;“采得百花成蜜后，為誰(shuí)辛苦為誰(shuí)甜”這是蜜蜂的精神;“燃燒自己，照亮別人”是蠟燭的精神?？梢哉f(shuō)每種產(chǎn)物的存在，都有一種精神支撐著它。教師的存在呢?支撐它的就應(yīng)該是這種高尚的師德吧!
報(bào)告會(huì)上，我和同事們聽得很認(rèn)真，記得很仔細(xì)，不時(shí)的被方永剛的事跡感動(dòng)得熱淚盈眶。走上三尺講臺(tái)，我們教書育人;走下三尺講臺(tái)，我們?yōu)槿藥煴?。師德，不是?jiǎn)單的說(shuō)教，而是一種精神體現(xiàn)，一種深厚的知識(shí)內(nèi)涵和文化品味的體現(xiàn)。讓我們一起建設(shè)愛崗敬業(yè)、愛生如子的首醫(yī)家園，用我們的愛與責(zé)任撐起教育的藍(lán)天。
經(jīng)典演講稿開場(chǎng)白篇2
像珍惜愛情一樣珍惜你的現(xiàn)在
說(shuō)起來(lái)很諷刺。當(dāng)我最終定下來(lái)寫有關(guān)珍惜的講稿時(shí)，想上網(wǎng)搜幾個(gè)有關(guān)珍惜的名言警句，于是我打開百度網(wǎng)頁(yè)，再搜索欄里輸入“珍惜”，空格，“名言警句”，然后摁了回車。一個(gè)讓我有些尷尬又哭笑不得的事情發(fā)生了。我看到，在蹦出來(lái)的十個(gè)詞條里邊，有七八個(gè)在“珍惜”兩個(gè)字的后面，緊跟著的是“小學(xué)生演講稿”?？磥?lái)，我打算要在大學(xué)課堂里當(dāng)作重點(diǎn)來(lái)講的東西是人家小學(xué)生早就知道的。
是啊，對(duì)于珍惜，或許在我們很小的時(shí)候就已經(jīng)知道了，甚至已經(jīng)懂得了它的涵義以及如何才能做到珍惜。然而，知道就等于自己都做到了嗎?事實(shí)并非如此，所以我最終還是選擇了這個(gè)看起來(lái)似乎有些幼稚的話題，因?yàn)橛袝r(shí)候不是大家不知道珍惜，而往往是在擁有的時(shí)候忘記了要珍惜。我想，或許現(xiàn)在我們都需要被“珍惜”這兩個(gè)字來(lái)提醒。
不知道大家還記不記得這樣一則新聞：一架飛外阿拉斯加的飛機(jī)因?yàn)闄C(jī)械故障，造成機(jī)毀人亡，墜入了太平洋。當(dāng)時(shí)看到這則新聞的時(shí)候，讓我印象最深的是報(bào)道說(shuō)，在那些遇難者中，有一對(duì)要去阿拉斯加度蜜月的新婚夫婦。我?guī)缀蹩梢韵胂蟮玫皆陲w機(jī)失事前，那對(duì)新婚夫婦臉上洋溢的喜悅和甜蜜?；蛟S他們還在規(guī)劃著飛機(jī)著陸后，將去哪里就餐，或許直接奔往早已定好的酒店入住，再或許一起欣賞向往已久的極地風(fēng)光?？墒侨说纳悄敲创嗳酰麄兩踔羴?lái)不及好好地享受已經(jīng)擁有的幸福。
那些無(wú)辜的人們一瞬間就喪失了生命，看著死難者家屬無(wú)助又痛苦的電視畫面，我的心情復(fù)雜極了。對(duì)于那對(duì)年輕的夫婦來(lái)說(shuō)，不幸的，是小夫妻倆沒能來(lái)得及享受蜜月期間的快樂，而所幸的是，他們已經(jīng)彼此找到了對(duì)方，并以對(duì)方為伴。最起碼他們?cè)谏淖詈笠欢螘r(shí)光中是幸福的，因?yàn)樗麄兩磉呌邢鄲鄣娜伺惆?，他們珍惜了自己的愛情。我甚至可以想象，在他們知道自己就要離開人世之前，浮現(xiàn)在他們臉上的是那早已把恐懼驅(qū)散的沒了蹤影的幸福笑容。
同學(xué)們，再想想我們吧，看到這些難道就沒有觸動(dòng)?瑞士偉大的民-主主義教育家——裴斯太羅奇說(shuō)過(guò)，今天的事沒有做，明天再早也是耽誤了。是啊，為什么我們要等到失去或已無(wú)法挽回的時(shí)候才追悔莫及。這一刻的我們不會(huì)知道下一刻會(huì)有怎樣的變化，甚至不知道現(xiàn)在擁有的一切是否突然就會(huì)溜走，所以我們必須像珍惜愛情一樣珍惜現(xiàn)在。
經(jīng)典演講稿開場(chǎng)白篇3
Opening Statement
mr. chairman, senator thurmond, members of the committee, my name is anita f. hill, and i am a professor of law at the university of oklahoma. i was born on a farm in okmulgee county, oklahoma, in 1956. i am the youngest of 13 children. i had my early education in okmulgee county. my father, albert hill, is a farmer in that area. my mother's name is irma hill. she is also a farmer and a housewife.
my childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents. i was reared in a religious atmosphere in the baptist faith, and i have been a member of the antioch baptist church in tulsa, oklahoma, since 1983. it is a very warm part of my life at the present time.
for my undergraduate work, i went to oklahoma state university and graduated from there in 1977. i am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.
i graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the yale law school, where i received my jd degree in 1980. upon graduation from law school, i became a practicing lawyer with the washington, dc, firm of ward, hardraker, and ross.
in 1981, i was introduced to now judge thomas by a mutual friend. judge thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if i would be interested in working with him. he was, in fact, appointed as assistant secretary of education for civil rights. after he had taken that post, he asked if i would become his assistant, and i accepted that position.
in my early period there, i had two major projects. the first was an article i wrote for judge thomas' signature on the education of minority students. the second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because judge thomas transferred to the eeoc where he became the chairman of that office.
during this period at the department of education, my working relationship with judge thomas was positive. i had a good deal of responsibility and independence. i thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment. after approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.
what happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things -- experiences of my life. it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleeplenumber -- a great number of sleeplenights tha(t i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.
i declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working relationship. i had a normal social life with other men outside of the office. i believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised. i was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.
i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions. however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions. he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him. these incidents took place in his office or mine. they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.
my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuse-x. on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria. after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of se-xual matters.
his conversations were very vivid. he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having se-x with animals and films showing group se-x or rape scenes. he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various se-x acts. on several occasions, thomas told me graphically of his own se-xual prowess.
because i was extremely uncomfortable talking about se-x with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these subjects. i would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonse-xual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs. my efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.
throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements. my reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations. this was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of education -- or of
fice for civil rights.
猜你喜歡：