與什么相比的英語短語

時(shí)間：2017-01-11 17:35:56 玉蓮928由分享

　　與他想必的話，你的琴藝還沒學(xué)到家呢。下面是學(xué)習(xí)啦小編給大家整理的與什么相比的英語短語的相關(guān)知識(shí)，供大家參閱!

　　與什么相比的英語短語篇1

　　1. CBS's ratings again showed huge improvement over the previous year.

　　與前一年相比，哥倫比亞廣播公司的收視率再次大幅提高。

　　2. Marseilles has proved to be a better racial melting pot than Lyons.

　　事實(shí)證明，與里昂相比，馬賽是一個(gè)更好的種族大熔爐。

　　3. She'smuch happier performing live than in a recording studio.

　　與在錄音棚里錄音相比，她更喜歡現(xiàn)場(chǎng)表演。

　　4. Ferries are very powerful and manoeuvrable compared to cargo ships.

　　與貨船相比，渡船馬力大而且易操縱。

　　5. Was it fair to compare independent schools with state schools?

　　拿私立學(xué)校與州立學(xué)校相比，這樣公平嗎?

　　6. He makes unfavourable comparisons between British and French cooking.

　　他認(rèn)為與法國(guó)菜相比，英國(guó)菜相形見絀。

　　7. Is the human heart weak in comparison with the other organs?

　　與其他器官相比，人的心臟是不是很脆弱?

　　8. Columbia was a young city compared to venerable Charleston.

　　與歷史悠久的查爾斯頓相比，哥倫比亞是個(gè)年輕的城市。

　　9. Their lives are a far cry from his own poor childhood.

　　他們的生活與他那貧苦的童年生活相比大相徑庭。

　　10. She learned to stop putting herself down and comparing herself to others.

　　她學(xué)會(huì)了不再自我貶低，拿自己與別人相比。

　　11. Poor sleepers take longer to fall asleep than good sleepers.

　　與睡眠好的人相比，睡眠不好的人要花更長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間才能入睡。

　　12. Emerald starlings are fairly small when compared with other such birds.

　　與同類的其他鳥相比，翠輝椋鳥要小很多。

　　13. The cost was peanuts compared to a new kitchen.

　　與建新廚房相比，那筆費(fèi)用微不足道。

　　14. He's good company, as small boys go.

　　與其他小男孩相比，他挺好相處。

　　15. German banks have more insider knowledge than most.

　　德國(guó)銀行與大多數(shù)銀行相比知曉更多的內(nèi)部消息。

　　與什么相比的英語短語篇2

　　正如上面提到的，與Axis1.x相比，Axis2構(gòu)建于全新的體系結(jié)構(gòu)之上。

　　As mentioned above, Axis2 is built on a completely new architecture as compared with Axis 1.x.

　　正如上面提到的，Axis2也具有處理程序的概念，但與Axis1.x相比，指定和部署處理程序的方式有一些變化。

　　As mentioned above, Axis2 also has the concept of handler but when compared to Axis 1.x there are few changes in the way you specify and deploy handlers.

　　在圖1 中，與Domino 6.5相比，可以看到R6inotes虛擬用戶所需CPU資源實(shí)質(zhì)性的減少。

　　In figure 1, you will see a substantial reduction in CPU resources required for an R6inotes virtualuser, compared to what we had with Domino 6.5.

　　說不使用要更容易一些：如果與XML1.0相比帶來的受益很小，或者把數(shù)據(jù)保存到XML 1.0的方法很脆弱或者容易丟失，那么就不使用。

　　It's certainly easy to say when not to use one: when the incremental benefit over XML 1.0 is small, or the route to preserving your data in XML 1.0 is fragile or lossy.

　　與XHTML1.0相比，這種安排更符合邏輯，其他很多標(biāo)記詞匯表的用戶對(duì)此也很熟悉。

　　This is a much more logical arrangement than in XHTML 1.0, and will be familiar to users ofmany other markup vocabularies.

　　您也知道，與AIX5.1相比，AIX 5.2更加優(yōu)秀、也更加穩(wěn)定。

　　If you recall, AIX 5.2 was a lot better and more stable than AIX 5.1.

　　通常，用戶數(shù)越大，Domino7與Domino6.5相比具有更大的性能提高。

　　Generally, the more users, the better the improvement for Domino 7 compared with Domino 6.5.

　　在本文的結(jié)尾部分，我們展示了與Domino6.5相比，運(yùn)行在所有平臺(tái)上的Domino 7增加了基準(zhǔn)測(cè)試用戶數(shù)量。

　　To this end, we have shown increased benchmark users running on all platforms, compared to the number of users with Domino 6.5.

　　隨著可伸縮性的增強(qiáng)，與Domino6.5相比，Domino7減少了處理相同數(shù)量的用戶時(shí)所需要的CPU 資源數(shù)量。

　　Along with this increase in scalability, Domino 7 has reduced the amount of CPU needed tohandle an equal number of users, compared to Domino 6.5.

　　這個(gè)測(cè)試以及以前的測(cè)試，有效地證明了與Domino6.5相比，Domino7在可伸縮性、性能和TCO 方面的改進(jìn)。

　　This, and previous tests, confirm that Domino 7 improves on the scalability, performance, andTCO, when compared to Domino 6.5.

　　與del.icio.us相比，digg.com和Reddit更側(cè)重于自己的頁面設(shè)計(jì)，但用戶仍可對(duì)其站點(diǎn)進(jìn)行定制和控制。

　　and Reddit might be more focused on their Web pages than, say, del.icio.us, but users can stillgain a measure of customization and control over these sites.

　　與什么相比的英語短語篇3

　　下表顯示了Domino7與Domino6.5相比CPU 性能改進(jìn)的百分比

　　The following table shows the percent of CPU improvement for Domino 7 compared to Domino6.5

　　使用更少的CPU資源，節(jié)省內(nèi)存，并且支持的用戶數(shù)增加了 50%。與Domino6.5相比，Domino7在可伸縮性、性能和TCO 方面繼續(xù)得到改進(jìn)。

　　With lower CPU usage, improved memory savings, and an increase of 50 percent more userssupported, Domino 7 continues to improve on the scalability, performance, and TCO when compared to Domino 6.5.

　　Expedia和它的姊妹公司Hotels.com在傳統(tǒng)房間的價(jià)格方面與Booking.com相比具有一定的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力，但酒店網(wǎng)站上顯示出的特大床房的價(jià)格卻和Priceline一樣。

　　Expedia and sister site Hotels.com offer traditional rooms at comparable rates to Booking.com’swhile the hotel website’s rate for the room with the king bed is the same as Priceline’s.

　　與Domino6.5相比，在z/OS 上使用Domino7 來運(yùn)行郵件基準(zhǔn)測(cè)試可以總共改進(jìn) 25%到 30%(詳見下表)。

　　The total improvement when running the mail benchmark test is 25 to 30 percent for Domino 7on z/OS, compared to Domino 6.5 (details follow).

　　僅僅利用這些改進(jìn)，z/OS上的Domino7 與Domino6.5相比就可以對(duì)CPU利用率改進(jìn) 17%到 20%。

　　With these changes alone, Domino 7 on z/OS shows a 17 to 20 percent CPU utilizationimprovement compared to Domino 6.5.

　　與 digg.com 相比，Reddit 的界面簡(jiǎn)單得多(您可能會(huì)說這個(gè)界面太過 “實(shí)際”，但這并非壞事)，由于摘要更為簡(jiǎn)短，因此就能列出更多的頭條新聞故事。

　　The Reddit interface is much simpler ("utilitarian", you might say, but this can be a good thing), and more of the top stories are listed because of the briefer summaries.

　　如圖1所示，在相同的模擬用戶數(shù)量下，相同的時(shí)間內(nèi)運(yùn)行相同的工作負(fù)載，結(jié)果顯示Domino7與Domino6.5 相比減少了 27% 的CPU 資源占用。

　　As figure 1 shows, the same number of simulated users, running the same workload for thesame amount of time, results in a 27 percent reduction in CPU usage between Domino 7 andDomino 6.5.

　　在7000 個(gè)用戶的負(fù)載級(jí)別上，Domino7與Domino6.5 相比，顯示了顯著的CPU占用節(jié)省。

　　Domino 7 has shown significant reduction in CPU utilization vs. Domino 6.5, at the 7000 userload level.

　　如圖6所示，與Domino6.5相比，可以看到 R6iNotes虛擬用戶所需CPU 的資源有實(shí)質(zhì)性的減少。

　　As figure 6 shows, we found a substantial reduction in CPU resources required for an R6iNotesvirtual user, compared to what we had with Domino 6.5.

　　在最多包含4000 個(gè)用戶的多個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)點(diǎn)上，Domino7與Domino6.5 相比CPU資源占用都減少了(參見圖2)。

　　Domino 7 produced reduction in CPU utilization vs. Domino 6.5, at multiple data points, up toand including 4000 mail users (see figure 2).

　　正如可以從這些基準(zhǔn)測(cè)試數(shù)據(jù)中可以發(fā)現(xiàn)的一樣，在Windows2003EnterpriseServer 上運(yùn)行的Domino7 與Domino6.5相比有幾個(gè)方面的性能優(yōu)勢(shì)。

　　As you can observe from our benchmark data, Domino 7 running on Windows 2003 EnterpriseServer has several significant performance advantages over Domino 6.5.

　　與Domino6.5相比，Domino7在 10,000 個(gè)用戶負(fù)載的情況下對(duì)CPU 的占用率有了很大的改進(jìn)。

　　Domino 7 shows significant reduction in CPU utilization vs. Domino 6.5, at the 10,000 user loadlevel.

　　Akka 1.1的默認(rèn)調(diào)度程序與1.0相比有哪些改善呢;HawtDispatch 在哪些地方更有用或者更快呢?

　　InfoQ: How was the Akka 1.1 default dispatcher improved over 1.0; where is HawtDispatch usefulor faster?

　　在圖5 中，與Domino 6.5 相比，將看到R6iNotes虛擬用戶所需的CPU資源有實(shí)質(zhì)性的減少。

　　In figure 5, you will see a substantial reduction in CPU resources required for an R6iNotes virtualuser, compared to what we had with Domino 6.5.

　　與LDAP5.2 相比，ITDS是一個(gè)改進(jìn)的版本。

　　ITDS is a beautified release compared to LDAP5.2. Some important features are

　　與Domino6.5相比，使用mail6.ntf和mail7.ntf 模板的Domino7 都得到了較大的性能改進(jìn)。

　　Domino 7 improved CPU with both mail6.ntf and mail7.ntf compared to Domino 6.5.

　　實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果表明，該方法在防止誤差積累方面與G.729相比，性能有明顯的提高。

　　Simulation tests indicate that the new method is better than the standard technology used in G.729.